Max Mason. Application No. 6205. 1922-1924.
      
        Type of event: Incarcerations
Location: Minnesota; United States
Document date:
Document type: Gov't Record(s)
Document subtype: Pardon Application
Documents: Max Mason. Application No. 6205. 1922-1924.
Citation:
Minnesota. Board of Pardons.
Max Mason: Application No. 5702.
Pardon Application.
File no. 6205, 1922-1924.
Application.
Image text
5702
No.  6205_
Name  Max
Mason__
	PRISON	
					
STATE OF MINNESOTA
BOARD OF PARDONS
					
5702
Den 1-23
APPLICATION
To the Board of Pardons
	OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
1.  The
application of  Max
Mason							No.5702	
		(Give
name under which convicted)
for a pardon
											
	(State whether pardon or commutation is
desired)
2. Pleaded guilty	on
the thirtieth	day of 
July		1921  in the
District			
   
Convicted
    Court in and for the 
County	of  St. Louis					        
of the crime
   
of	Rape.											
    and imprisoned in
the  Penetentiary (sic) at Stillwater,
Minnesota.				
    on  Aug. 8,
1921			for the term of Ind.-Max 30 years		        
; and who is
    now imprisoned
pursuant to such sentence.
3. The name and postoffice
address of the trial judge is  Hon. L. S. Nelson	, Duluth,
Minn.			
     and the prosecuting attorney is 
Mason M. Forbes, Esq., Duluth, Minn.				
4.
Applicant’s full and true name is  Max
Mason						
    His age is  23 
years and his birth-place was   Decatur,
Alabama					
    Father’s name  Philip
Mason			Nationality 
Colored				
    Mother’s name  Letha
Mason			Nationality 
Colored				
5. I have never been known by any alias
except  “Sonnyboy”						
  
												
6. I was never arrested, indicted or
convicted of any other offences except  Thirty days on work farm,		
Louisville, Ky. – Fined $10.00 at Pinesville Ky., and  Alabama State
Prison for Larceny.	
7. Applicant’s occupation and
residence during the five years next before conviction of the offense for which
his is now 
    serving were as follows: 
Employed as laborer and with circus.					
8.  Attach hereto either a transcript of the evidence
introduced at the trial or give a brief statement of the facts leading to
    conviction of the crime for which you are
now serving.
	Miss Irene Tuskin and James Sullivan, two
young people living in the city of	 Duluth, Minnesota, claim to have visited the
Robinson Shows at that place about 9	 o’clock, Monday night, June 14, 920;
that while standing upon the show grounds they	 were seized by six negroes,
employes (sic) of the show and carried a distance of about	 a block where in the
darkness Miss Tuskin was raped by four or five of her assailants;	 that no
outcry was made because one of the negroes held a gun at the head of Sullivan;	
that after they were released the couple walked a few blocks to the Merrit
School-house,	 sat there on the steps and talked for a few minutes, then walked
back to the Grand	 Avenue car line, took a car and rode ten blocks west, then
walked three blocks to the	 young woman’s home, sat on the porch for a
while talking. That the young woman went	 into the house, spoke to her parents
but said nothing about the alleged rape and retired	 for the night. The first
report of the alleged rape was made by the young man after he	 had gone to work.
Several of the Negro employes (sic) of the show were brought back to Duluth on
the following day and three of them were lynched that night by a mob and	 hung
to an electric light post.									
	Seven or eight other Negroes were
brought to Duluth, among them your		 petitioner who was indicted and on trial in
the District Court at Duluth convicted of raping	 Irene
Tuskin.																																			
9. Your petitioner asks that a pardon or 	
	be granted upon the grounds and for the reasons
following:
			(Pardon or
Commutation)
	From the testimony offered at the trial it is
apparent that the verdict of the jury	 was due entirely to passion and
prejudice; that the evidence was not sufficient to sustain	 a conviction; that
your petitioner is innocent; that he comes squarely within the		 contemplation
of the duties of the Pardon Board in the granting of relief from punishment	
improperly inflicted through a story which in its entirety is unusual and
strikingly		 improbable and calculated to create bias and dethrone reason in the
mind of the		 average juror to the extent of depriving him of that sane and wise
judgment that should	 actuate the mind of a fair and impartial
juror.																															
Respectfully submitted,
						Max Mason			
	Dated at 
Stillwater	this  21st
	day of  February		,
1924	
No. 6205
5702
APPLICATION
				For the		pardon		of
					MAX MASON		__
				Filed on the 	  	     day of
						       , A. D.
1922
					 			__
							Clerk.
[Handwritten]	I approve a Recomm on the [illegible] 3/14/24; [signature
illegible] chief 
justice; Clifford Cullin
