State of Minnesota vs. Max Mason. Case No. 22590. 1921-1922. Affidavit in Support of Motion.
Type of event: Legal Proceedings
Location: Minnesota; United States
Document date:
Document type: Gov't Record(s)
Document subtype: Affidavit in Support of Motion
Documents: State of Minnesota vs. Max Mason. Case No. 22590. 1921-1922. Affidavit in Support of Motion.
Citation:
Minnesota. Supreme Court.
Case Files.
No. 22590 (State of Minnesota vs. Max Mason), 1921-1922.
Affidavit in Support of Motion.
Image text
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)
SS.
COUNTY OF ST. LOUIS )
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)
VS ) RAPE.
)
MAX MASON )
************************************************************
AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION
R. C. McCullough, first being duly sworn according to law, deposes and says
that he is one of the attorneys of record in the above intitled [sic] cause, and
so representing the defendant, Max Mason, this affiant says, that the defendant,
Max Mason, is a poor person and has no money or means to supply the printed
record and brief in the above entitled cause, and that he is compelled to rely
upon the charity of friends who have undertaken to supply funds for the printing
of said record and brief. That thru the kindness of person interested in this
cause, the transcript of record has been supplied at a cost of nearly Four
Hundred ($400.00) Dollars, and that a small sum of money les than One Hundred
($100.00) Dollars is available at the date hereof to pay for printed record and
brief, which sum is insufficient to pay all the expenses for printing the brief
and record in apt time for the presentation of said cause in the Supreme Court,
which costs of printing same is estimated to be about Five Hundred ($500.00)
Dollars or more.
This affiant further says, that F. L. Barnett of Chicago is
associated in the presentation of defendant’s Appeal in the Supreme Court,
and that counsel in this cause will apply all the money received first to the
printing of the brief, so that the same may be presented to the Supreme Court at
the earliest possible time, but the affiant believes that the expenses cannot be
met in a less time than Thirty (30) days from date.
Wherefore affiant
presents herewith a motion to extend the time for filing the printed brief in
the above cause for a period of Thirty (30)
days and that the ORIGINAL TYPEWRITTEN RECORD now on file be allowed to be
used for the presentation of defendant’s Appeal in the Supreme Court, and
supporting same and in connection with said motion attaches hereto, a
stipulation signed by Warren E. Greene, County Attorney of Saint Louis County,
who prosecuted said cause.
And further affiant sayeth not.
R. C.
McCullough
Subscribed and sworn to before me
this 24th day of
September, 1921.
J. A. Cummings
Deputy Clerk of District Court
St. Louis County, Minn.